Compare
Document comparison engine
Compare analyzes two @mentioned documents side-by-side — structural differences, content overlap, contradictions, gaps, and a concrete recommendation on which to use as the canonical version.
How it works
Side-by-side analysis with
contradiction detection
Mention two documents with @. Compare finds every difference, overlap, and contradiction — then recommends which should be canonical and what to merge from the other.
Structural Diff
Section-by-section comparison. What exists in A but not B, what's duplicated, what's reorganized. See the structural DNA of each document.
Contradiction Detection
Claims in Document A that conflict with Document B are flagged with specific quotes from both sides. No ambiguity — you see exactly where they disagree.
Gap Analysis
What's in A but missing from B? What's in B but missing from A? Critical for merging documents or identifying what each version adds.
Merge Recommendation
Which document should be the canonical version? What content should be merged from the other? Specific, actionable guidance for resolution.
Precision, not guesswork
Not "they look pretty similar."
Every difference identified and classified.
Any two documents
Two versions. One clear answer.
Whenever you have competing documents that need resolution.
Contract Versions
Your draft vs counterparty redlines — every change identified
Policy Revisions
Current policy vs proposed update — impact of every change
Research Papers
Two studies on the same topic — agreements and contradictions
Spec Revisions
Original spec vs updated requirements — scope creep identified
Strategy Documents
Competing proposals — strengths, weaknesses, and recommended approach
Content Drafts
Multiple drafts of the same piece — best elements from each