Review
Structured quality assessment
Review cross-references your document against vault content, checking completeness, accuracy, clarity, and consistency — then delivers structured feedback organized by severity.
How it works
Thorough review with
structured, actionable feedback
Open a file and run /review. The system reads the full document, cross-references your vault, and produces a structured assessment: Summary, Strengths, Issues by severity, and Suggestions.
Structured Format
Every review follows the same structure: Summary, Strengths, Issues (Critical → Major → Minor), and Suggestions. Consistent, scannable, complete.
Cross-Referenced
Claims are checked against your vault. Inconsistencies with other documents flagged. Missing citations identified. The review knows your whole body of work.
Severity Tiers
Issues ranked Critical (blocks publication), Major (should fix), and Minor (nice to fix). You know exactly what to fix first and what can wait.
Specific Suggestions
Not just what's wrong — specific suggestions for how to improve. Restructure this section, add this citation, clarify this claim, merge these paragraphs.
Systematic, not subjective
Not "LGTM."
Structured assessment that finds what humans miss.
Any document worth reviewing
Thorough review for documents that matter.
Any document heading toward publication, approval, or stakeholders.
Legal Documents
Contracts, briefs, policies — checked against precedent and regulation
Research Papers
Methodology, citations, conclusions — checked for rigor
Marketing Copy
Claims, tone, consistency — checked against brand guidelines
Technical Specs
Completeness, feasibility, consistency — checked against codebase
Financial Reports
Figures, forecasts, assumptions — checked against source data
Strategic Plans
Completeness, feasibility, internal consistency, evidence quality